|
|---|
Readers
familiar only with my theological writings may be surprised to hear that for a
brief time I considered an avocational career as a
movie reviewer. I’ve always enjoyed movies, and I thought that some of my
observations on films might be useful, at least to my students who took courses
from me in modern culture. I had before me, also, the example of my colleague
So around
1992-93, I wrote up a number of reviews, with some introductory reflections on
the medium. My main purpose was to use them in courses, but I also sent them
around to publishers and to periodicals, in hope that I could perhaps moonlight
somewhere as a reviewer, following Harvie. The
responses were wholly negative. Publishers did not want to publish movie books,
because they got out-of-date so fast. Periodical editors thought, well, that I
should not give up my day job.
Hence the unmaking of a reviewer. But I have used these
reviews and analytical pieces in other contexts, and the responses have not
been totally negative. So I make them available now on the web. The reviews are
still dated. Most are from around 1993, though I have added one or two in the
years since. But with the increasing popularity of tape and DVD, there may
still be interest in these particular films. More important, these reviews may be helpful
to readers as they seek to evaluate more contemporary films.
I should warn you that the reviews contain “spoilers.” That is, I have reviewed the films as one reviews classic literature, with freedom to describe the ending and relate that ending to the overall interpretation. If anyone cannot bear to know the endings in advance, I urge you to see the film before reading the review.