
This is a very
special time of the year, for professors as well as graduating students There you
all sit, bright and scrubbed, full of all the knowledge we've been able to cram
into you over the last few years, eager, idealistic, full of great ambitions,
most of them wholesome. Yes, most of you, all of you I would say, are anxious
for the battle, excited about spreading the wonderful Word of God's grace,
casting down imaginations, bringing every thought captive to the obedience of
Christ. We professors observe your great ambitions, and your great faith, and
we expect wonderful things from God and you. Often those expectations are
marvelously fulfilled. Our graduates start new churches, help churches to grow
in spirit and in numbers, write books, preach the Word to people in cultures
hungry for the gospel. Often they come back and tell us what God has been doing
through their labors, so that we praise God.
But it doesn't
always happen that way. Sometimes our graduates have had unhappy ministries. Indeed,
it has happened so often that we professors, like fathers and mothers watching
their sons go off to war, may come to graduation with mixed emotions, mingling
our joy with prayers for your perseverance, indeed for your survival, in the
Lord's work.
Why are there so
many unhappy ministries in Reformed churches today? Why are there so many congregations
that are divided by strife over doctrinal and practical matters? Why are there
so many churches which begin with fifty members and thirty years later are
still struggling along with fifty members- or forty, or thirty-five? Why are
there so many Reformed churches where visitors come to services for a few weeks
and then leave, believing that no one cares about them? Why are our churches so
powerless in their attempts to reach young people, the poor, the black, the
Hispanic, the uneducated? Why is Reformed scholarship, the pride and joy of our
movement, now making so little impact upon our culture? Why is the Reformed
world-and-life view having so little influence on national institutions, at a
time when other Christians are in the forefront of the American dialogue?
Well, if I could
answer all those questions, I might have to charge the graduates every year. That would never do. And of course
these questions are complex. There are many
reasons for unhappy ministries. And sometimes, let me quickly remind you, these
reasons are not at all the fault of the minister. You may be called to a
church, told that that church has six faithful families. Two weeks after you
arrive, three of those families inform you that they're moving away; one, you discover,
is in the midst of a divorce; in another family, the husband is tired of shouldering
his church tasks and wants to resign from the session and from his Sunday
school teaching; the last of the six families, you discover, hasn't been to
church in six months, and no one really knows why. Exaggerated? Not too much.
That kind of thing really happens. That's not your fault; that's the working of
Satan and his human servants; that's just the way it is, sometimes, in a fallen
world. When that happens, you just have to make the best of it and pray a lot.
But sometimes it is our fault. And sometimes when things
work out well, it is to our credit, though ultimately the praise belongs to God
alone. One very happy experience I've
had since moving to
O.K., here's the
heart of it: I think that in many, though certainly not all, unhappy
ministries, there is a common syndrome, and that syndrome is distressingly
similar to the attitude of the wicked servant in Jesus' parable of the talents.
It begins, as our problems often do, with a false picture of God. "Master,"
the servant says in verse 24, "I knew that you are a hard man, harvesting
where you have not sown and gathering where you have not scattered seed." Now what's wrong with that? God is hard sometimes, is he not? His judgments are
terrible. He visits the iniquities of the fathers upon the children to the
third and fourth generations of them that hate him. He takes the wealth of the
wicked by his mighty power and therefore, in one relevant sense, harvests where
he did not sow. Like other lies of Satan, this one
contains truth. In fact, like other lies of Satan, this one exhibits
theological cleverness. But you can see how wrong it is, can't you? This
servant has no understanding of the master's love and grace. This master
doesn't hate his servants. The two faithful servants found that out. The master
commended them, gave them great responsibilities, invited
them to share his own happiness.
Dear brothers and
sisters, we know about God's love and grace, don't we? We know that in Christ,
God has given his very lifeblood for us. And he is still ready, eager to do
exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think. There is no way we can
begin to measure the length, the breadth, the height, the depth of the love of
Christ. And yet with all of that, do we sometimes forget? Do we lose what Jack
Miller calls the "grace perspective" on our ministries? Or, worst of
all, are there some of us who do not believe in a God of love, the God of the
Bible? How easy it is, despite our theology of grace, to get into the habit of
thinking of God as a harsh, mean taskmaster and nothing more. And what a
terrible toll such thinking takes- upon our frame of mind, upon our decisions,
upon our ministries.
In short, the result
is that we begin making decisions out of fear, rather than in faith. We believe
that God doesn't really want to bless our ministries, and so we seek only to
cover our losses. Sometimes, using all the theological cleverness we've picked
up at seminary, it comes out sounding like this: "God isn't interested in
results, but only in faithfulness." Another ingenious half truth! God
wants faithfulness above all, of course. But he also wants results. He is the
God of results. He speaks and things happen. And he wants his people to care
about results. The apostle Paul became all things to all men that he might by
all means save some. You can't be faithful unless you are seeking results! The
two faithful servants in our parable invested their master's money in ways
calculated to bring a good return. Of course, in the world of investment, nothing
is certain. But
faithfulness involves trying, seeking the best results possible. The wicked
servant didn't try. He did not seek success, only an excuse for failure. He did
not look for winnings, only ways of covering his losses.
This happens so
often in unhappy ministries. Let's say the exodus of members begins, and the
elders don't understand what is happening. One family hasn't attended for six
months. Well, the minister reminds us, he did visit that family seven months ago
in the annual elder visitation. He has no idea what the problem is, but after
all, the delinquent family really ought to come and see their pastor, shouldn't
they? He has done, he thinks, what he is obligated
to do; he has been faithful, he thinks. Beyond that, the results are in God's hands. Thus the minister covers his
losses with clever theological rationalization, while his church is going to
Hell. He defends his own fear and, yes, his laziness- that's what Jesus calls
it in our passage- while God's sheep wander away.
The legalistic mind
is so theologically clever. The Pharisees could justify nearly any kind of conduct.
The legalist likes best to reduce his obligations to a neat list: this is what I
must do; that is what I must not do; for the rest, I do what I like. As long as
I see every family once a year and preach biblical sermons, no one can fault
me. And so the wicked servant in our parable hid his talent in the ground,
having persuaded himself that that was his minimum
obligation, that no one could find fault with him if he returned the talent
intact. Burying the talent didn't accomplish anything, but the servant thought
it would at least cover his tracks. We all know how hospitals, when discharging
patients, insist that they ride out in wheelchairs, even when they are
perfectly able to walk. That is a worthless and silly use for a good
wheelchair. It doesn't help anybody. But it helps the hospital to cover its
tracks if a legal problem develops. I wonder how often our decisions in our
ministries are like that- decisions not seriously intended to accomplish
anything for God, but merely to cover ourselves, if we come under attack.
How easy it is for a
kind of "minimalism" to creep into our thinking- the idea of doing
the minimum we think we can get away with, rather than what will honor Christ
and build up his people. The same temptation faces me often in the academic
field. In the press of a heavy schedule, I'm often tempted to think of some other
scholar of whose work I have a very low opinion. I note to myself that this
other scholar often does things I consider shoddy and gets away with them. Why,
then, I wonder, shouldn't I save some time and energy by cutting corners the
way he does? Cutting corners isn't always wrong. Sometimes footnotes, for
instance, are a necessity, sometimes an encumbrance; you have to decide what's
best in each situation. But cutting corners is wrong when it impoverishes
thought and inhibits communication. And thus the minimalistic mentality can
become deadly. It asks, not "how
can I serve others?" but "how much can I get away with, so as better
to serve myself?" It focuses, not on the example of divine love, but on
the example of the least competent people we know: "He gets away with it;
why shouldn't I?"
How different from
the Good Shepherd, the Lord Jesus Christ! He left his comfortable campground
with the ninety-nine sheep and searched through the menacing desert until he
found the sheep that was lost. He gave his life for the sheep. Jesus did not
seek some clever theological rationale for maintaining his own comfort; Satan
offered him several, and he turned them all down. He didn't emulate the least
competent of God's servants to determine the minimum he could get away with;
no, he went beyond Samson, Moses, David, Abraham, to achieve nothing less than
his father's own perfection. He did always those things which pleased his
father. Jesus didn't seek some legal principle to cover his tracks in case of
challenge; no, quite to the contrary: he took upon himself all the guilt and
suffering which we deserved. Jesus did not seek to reduce his responsibilities
to a neat job description consisting of a few simple obligations. He loved his own, and indeed loved them "unto the end."
That's the kind of attitude God seeks in each of his ministers- nothing less than the unconditional love of Jesus Christ for his people. We can therefore see why James advises us not to become teachers, knowing that we will receive more severe judgment. God expects much of us, much indeed. But don't get too preoccupied with God's demands. That could lead you back into legalism again. Think about God as the father of Jesus Christ, who gave his son for us. Think of him as the one who loves us with a love unmeasurable. Think of him as the one who wants to bless us far more than we want to receive his blessing. Think of him as the one who indeed sometimes withholds his blessings for mysterious reasons, as he did with Job, but who even in the valley of the shadow of death is leading you inexorably toward the eternal glory. That kind of love will motivate you out of sheer gratitude to begin a good shepherd ministry- a ministry where you forget about covering your tracks and lay your life on the line for God's people. It does happen. I believe that is the secret of New Life, and of all those churches which God is blessing today. May God give you the joy of such a ministry, and may you all hear, on the last day, the master's word, "Well done, good and faithful servant... Come and share your master's happiness."